Study shows birth is a tight squeeze for chimpanzees, too

3D simulation of the birth canal of chimpanzees with (B) the fetal head in a fully extended position, the typical head alignment in apes, and (C) the fetal head in a fully flexed position, the usual head alignment in humans. Credit: Nature Ecology & Evolution (2024). DOI: 10.1038/s41559-024-02558-7

According to a new study, chimpanzees, like humans, must contend with a confined bony birth canal when giving birth. In humans, the problem is exacerbated by our unique form of upright walking, since this led to a twisting of the bony birth canal, while the fetal head grew larger. The obstetrical dilemma therefore evolved gradually over the course of primate evolution rather than suddenly in humans as originally argued.

The birth process in chimpanzees and other great apes is generally considered to be easy. This is usually attributed to a relatively large pelvis and the small head of their newborn. In contrast, human childbirth is both more complex and riskier when compared to other mammals.

According to the original obstetrical dilemma hypothesis, our birth difficulty stems from a conflict that arose during human evolution between adaptations in the pelvis for upright walking and an increase in our infants’ brain size.

On the one hand, the pelvis shortened to improve balance while moving bipedally, while the baby’s larger head still had to fit through the birth canal. As a solution to this dilemma, the shape of the pelvic bones differs between the sexes (with females having larger dimensions despite smaller body sizes), and human babies are born more neurologically immature than other primates, so that brain growth is delayed to the postnatal period.

An international team of researchers led by Nicole M. Webb of the Senckenberg Research Institute and Martin Haeusler of the Institute of Evolutionary Medicine, University of Zurich, simulated birth in chimpanzees and humans and quantified the space between the bony birth canal and the fetal head. The work is published in the journal Nature Ecology & Evolution.

The study shows that narrow birth canals in relation to the infant head size are not unique to humans. Accordingly, the obstetrical dilemma hypothesis, which had previously been explained solely by the development of bipedalism and the size of the human brain, did not suddenly appear during the development of modern humans, but rather developed gradually over the course of primate evolution—and then intensified in humans, thus explaining the high rates of birth complications observed today.

Chimpanzee pelvis just as narrow as human pelvis

To test the obstetrical dilemma hypothesis, the research team first compared the available space in the birth canal of chimpanzees and humans, using the average distance between the fetal head and the pelvic bones while accounting for soft tissue contributions.

Using a three-dimensional virtual simulation of the birth process, they were able to show that the space in the chimpanzee pelvis is actually just as tight as it is in humans. Interestingly, after a detailed shape analysis, they also found that female chimpanzees have a more spacious pelvis than males, especially the smaller females, providing evidence of adaptations to deal with these space limitations.

The researchers also show that the great apes appear to trend towards humans in how neurologically immature, or how secondarily altricial their infants are compared to monkeys—again surprisingly similar to humans, although to a lesser magnitude.

“Based on these intriguing parallels, we propose a new hypothesis that the obstetrical dilemma developed gradually and became increasingly exacerbated over the course of evolution. This contradicts the previous theory that our long and difficult births emerged abruptly with the enlargement of the brain in Homo erectus,” explains Martin Haeusler.

The increase in body size in the ancestors of the great apes made their pelvis stiffer, which limited the ability of their ligaments to stretch during birth. In early hominins, the upright gait also led to a twisted bony birth canal, which required complex movements of the fetal head. This mechanism, rather than the narrowness of the birth canal, is likely the main cause of the difficult birth process in humans, the researchers argue.

Complex birthing process is an evolutionary compromise

The study shows that the remarkably complex human birth process is the result of gradual compromises during hominoid evolution. “The difficult birth and the neurological immaturity of our newborns, with the long learning phase that follows, are a prerequisite for the evolution of our intelligence. At the same time, we humans are only at one extreme—we are not unique among primates,” says Haeusler.

“There have even been isolated observations of birth assistance among captive orangutans. However, births of great apes in the wild are only observed extremely rarely—we urgently need more behavioral data,” insisted Webb.

More information:
Nicole M. Webb et al, Gradual exacerbation of obstetric constraints during hominoid evolution implied by re-evaluation of cephalopelvic fit in chimpanzees, Nature Ecology & Evolution (2024). DOI: 10.1038/s41559-024-02558-7

Provided by
University of Zurich


Citation:
Study shows birth is a tight squeeze for chimpanzees, too (2024, October 23)
retrieved 23 October 2024
from https://phys.org/news/2024-10-birth-tight-chimpanzees.html

This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no
part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.

FOLLOW US ON GOOGLE NEWS

Read original article here

Denial of responsibility! Secular Times is an automatic aggregator of the all world’s media. In each content, the hyperlink to the primary source is specified. All trademarks belong to their rightful owners, all materials to their authors. If you are the owner of the content and do not want us to publish your materials, please contact us by email – seculartimes.com. The content will be deleted within 24 hours.

Leave a Comment