While Hindustan Copper has exited the ban, IEX is the latest entrant on the list.
Any stock’s Future & Options contracts enter a ban period when its open interest (OI) exceeds 95% of the market-wide position limits (MWPL). The ban is lifted only when the open interest falls below 80% of MWPL.
Traders who trade in indices do not face situations where securities are placed under a ban.
The MWPL for ABFRL stood at 88.3% on Tuesday, with OI reported by Trendlyne at 41.2 million. It was down 1.9% from the previous session.The MWPL for Balrampur Chini stood at 113% on Tuesday, with OI reported by Trendlyne at 16.4 million. It was up 12% from the previous session.The MWPL for Bandhan Bank stood at 88% on Tuesday, with OI reported by Trendlyne at 97.4 million. It was down by 2.7% from the previous session. The MWPL for Chambal Fertilizers stood at 107.7% on Tuesday, with OI reported by Trendlyne at 13.3 million. It was down 7.4% from the previous session.
For GNFC, the MWPL stood at 101.6% on Tuesday, with OI reported by Trendlyne at 7.3 million. It was down 3% from the previous session.
MWPL for India Cements stood at 104.8% on Tuesday, with OI reported by Trendlyne at 16.3 million. It was down by 1.1% from the previous session.
For IEX, the MWPL stood at 99.8% on Tuesday, with OI reported by Trendlyne at 82 million. It was up 6.2% from the previous session.
The MWPL for Indus Towers stood at 94.9% on Tuesday, with OI reported by Trendlyne at 95.4 million. It was down by 1.1% from the previous session.
MWPL for PEL stood at 89.2% on Tuesday, with OI reported by Trendlyne at 14.9 million. It was down 3.6% from the previous session.
The Indian headline indices ended in the green on Tuesday, led by Maruti Suzuki India and State Bank of India. The 30-stock S&P BSE Sensex ended at 80,351.64, up by 391.26 points or 0.49%, while the broader Nifty settled the day at 24,433.20, gaining by 112.65 points or 0.46%.
(Disclaimer: Recommendations, suggestions, views and opinions given by the experts are their own. These do not represent the views of The Economic Times)