Ana Navarro Mocked For Citing Fictional Pardon To Defend Biden

CNN pundit Ana Navarro came in for some brutal social media mockery this week after she cited a fictional case to defend President Joe Biden’s recent pardon of his son, Hunter.

Navarro, who is also a co-host on “The View,” took to X, formerly Twitter, on Monday to point out that Biden isn’t the first president to pardon family members.

There are in fact some examples of this, as she noted: Bill Clinton’s pardon of his brother, Roger, and Donald Trump’s pardon of his daughter’s father-in-law, Charles Kushner.

But Navarro also pointed to Woodrow Wilson’s pardon of his brother-in-law, Hunter DeButts — who, by all accounts, is fictional.

Woodrow Wilson pardoned his brother-in-law, Hunter deButts.

Bill Clinton pardoned his brother, Roger.

Donald Trump pardoned his daughter’s father-in-law, Charlie Kushner. And just appointed him Ambassador to France.

But tell me again how Joe Biden “is setting precedent”? 🤣🤣

— Ana Navarro-Cárdenas (@ananavarro) December 2, 2024

Users in the social media platform’s community notes section quickly noted there was no evidence of any person named Hunter DeButts being pardoned by Wilson.

In addition, CheckYourFact.com did a deep dive to confirm that Navarro’s post about DeButts was factually inaccurate.

Navarro was repeatedly criticized for presenting false information as factual, before she commented on her error on Tuesday afternoon, but her excuse may have been worse than the error.

“Hey Twitter sleuths, thanks for taking the time to provide context. Take it up with Chat GPT…” she wrote, and added a laughing emoji.

That post was also slapped with a community that noted that “ChatGPT” and other language models (LLMs) have been known to “hallucinate” details that are presented as fact, but are actually false.

It’s an issue that has caused problems for others, such as a lawyer who faced sanctions last year after he used to ChatGPT to prepare a court filing for his client, only for the app to invent and cite cases that never happened.

In addition, ChatGPT once put law professor Jonathan Turley on a list of legal scholars who had sexually harassed someone — using as its source a Washington Post article that didn’t exist.

Navarro’s blaming of ChatGPT for her own errors didn’t go over so well with people on X.

My God you have been using ChatGPT to write your “factual” tweets?! LMAO

— Burt Macklin (@BurtMaclin_FBI) December 3, 2024

… ChatGPT was your source? Are you insane?

— Enguerrand VII de Coucy (@ingelramdecoucy) December 3, 2024

The correct response here was “My bad, Woodrow Wilson had no brother-in-law named Hunter deButts. I was lazy and farmed my tweet out to ChatGPT, and I’ve learned not to do that.”

But sure, you can act like we’re supposed to feel silly for noticing that you posted pure nonsense.

— pragmatometer (@pragmatometer) December 3, 2024

“I’m too lazy to do my own research” isn’t the stellar defense you may think.

— IT Guy (@ITGuy1959) December 3, 2024

How much do you get paid to not even do the bare minimum

— Kristi Yamaguccimane (@TheWapplehouse) December 4, 2024

Democracy In The Balance

Don’t let this be the end of the free press. The free press is under attack — and America’s future hangs in the balance. As other newsrooms bow to political pressure, HuffPost is not backing down.

Would you help us keep our news free for all? We can’t do it without you.

You’ve supported HuffPost before, and we’ll be honest — we could use your help again. We view our mission to provide free, fair news as critically important in this crucial moment, and we can’t do it without you.

Whether you give once or many more times, we appreciate your contribution to keeping our journalism free for all.

You’ve supported HuffPost before, and we’ll be honest — we could use your help again. We view our mission to provide free, fair news as critically important in this crucial moment, and we can’t do it without you.

Whether you give just one more time or sign up again to contribute regularly, we appreciate you playing a part in keeping our journalism free for all.

Support HuffPost

And you aren’t even embarrassed for erroneous sourcing. 😂

— Jason_FLMAN🐊 (@jason_flman) December 3, 2024

Some people felt obliged to continue the double entendre name trend started by the mention of DeButts.

You forgot to mention President Ford, who famously pardoned his nephew Hugh Janus.

— High Priest Gabagool 📟 (@Hpgabagool) December 3, 2024

What about Truman’s brother-in-law Hugh G. Rection or Warren Harding’s nephew Bruce “Barry” McCokiner?

— Bill Marshal (@aethelamerican) December 3, 2024

If ChatGPT told you President Daffy Duck pardoned his cousin Hugh G. Rection would you have just regurgitated that too?

— Jonathan Cumberland (@Jcumberland__) December 3, 2024

FOLLOW US ON GOOGLE NEWS

Read original article here

Denial of responsibility! Secular Times is an automatic aggregator of the all world’s media. In each content, the hyperlink to the primary source is specified. All trademarks belong to their rightful owners, all materials to their authors. If you are the owner of the content and do not want us to publish your materials, please contact us by email – seculartimes.com. The content will be deleted within 24 hours.

Leave a Comment